Get your research papers, homework and online exams done from just $8 per page

We also have verified textbook solutions at just $3 per answer; No subscription needed

Australia Business Law solutions

Category:
0
0
  1. Assume that the directors of small family company excluded one of their number from board meetings, that other director would have grounds for bringing
  2. A participating cumulative share which is preference as to dividend gives the holder
  3. If a director wishes to take a corporate opportunity the director requires the consent of
  4. If a corporation offers securities to the public before a disclosure document is lodged
  5. If A makes an offer to B and B then makes a counter offer to A which A rejects in those circumstances
  6. The doctrine of separation of powers as developed by montesquieu is that
  7. To be effective an exclusion clause must
  8. Minors have contractual capacity in regard to
  9. A term can be implied into a contract where
  10. A voidable transaction includes
  11. An ordinary resolution requires the assent of
  12. In the context of alternative dispute resolution
  13. If C agrees to paint D’s house and D agrees to give C the amount of $ 500
  14. The three branches of government as provided in the commonwealth constitution are

✅ Answers (2)

0
Private answer

Assume that the directors of small family company excluded one of their number from board meetings, that other director would have grounds for bringing

Answers

d. an action for oppressive conduct as in the Fexuto case

Explanation

A court can make an order on behalf of the member under oppressive conduct as applied in Fexuto case. If one shareholder is sidelined by the other shareholders without causes, he/she can sue for oppressive conduct. In the case between Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd [2001], the court found that Bosjnak with directors who were from the same family (brothers and sister in-law), had acted oppressively towards one of the brothers. They did this by excluding him from board discussions which was considered inappropriate. The directors of the small family in our case have replicated the same case and would be found oppressive to the excluded member.

Reference

Company Law: An Interactive Approach

By Ellie Chapple, Alex Wong, Richard Baumfield, Richard Copp, Robert Cunningham, Akshaya Kamalnath, Katherine Watson, Paul Harpur Page 314

 

A participating cumulative share which is preference as to dividend gives the holder

Answer

b. a right to a guaranteed dividend and any arrears dividends

Explanation

Where a preference share is cumulative, it implies that the right to the dividend is carried over to subsequent year if the right is not declared in a particular year. This means that instead of losing the right to arrears dividends as in the case of non-cumulative shares, the dividends are said to be arrears and carried over to a subsequent year. On the hand, participating shares offers the right to share extra dividends. Therefore, if there is an increase in rate of dividend, the preference share holder is entitled to the new rate.

Reference

Financial Reporting

By Janice Loftus, Ken Leo, Sorin Daniliuc, Noel Boys, Belinda Luke, Hong Nee Ang, Karyn Byrnes Page 480

 

If a director wishes to take a corporate opportunity the director requires the consent of

Answer

d. only a majority of votes cast at a shareholder meeting

Explanation

In public companies, directors are elected by shareholders at a general meeting and can as well be removed by resolution that needs to be passed by majority of the shareholders. Directors are elected by the shareholders meeting on a one-share-one-vote basis. A director wishing to take corporate responsibility can be elected through ordinary resolution or by decision of the directors. Each of the participating directors has only one vote, and the person presiding may decide to use the raising hands or by a poll and if there is an equality, the individual presiding is required to second or cast their own vote to break the tie.

 

If a corporation offers securities to the public before a disclosure document is lodged

Answer

a. there will be a breach of s 727(1)

Explanation

As stated in Australian Corporations & Securities legislation 2011 corporations Act 2001, (p. 901), the offer of securities must have lodged disclosure document otherwise it will constitute a breach of section 727(1). Unless when the disclosure document for the offer has been lodged with ASIC, a person must not make an offer of securities that needs disclosure to investors.

 

If A makes an offer to B and B then makes a counter offer to A which A rejects in those circumstances

Answer

c. B cannot change his mind and accept A's original offer, as his counter-off was also a rejection of A's original offer

Explanation

In contracts, a counter-offer functions both as an offer to enter into a contract, as well as a rejection of the original offer. Whenever the counter-offer is made, the original offer becomes invalid, which means accepting the original offer later cannot constitute a valid contract. Whenever the offeror makes an offer, the offeree has a choice of either to accept it and be bound by the terms, or reject the offer and make a counter-offer if he/she wishes to.

 

The doctrine of separation of powers as developed by montesquieu is that

Answer

a. each branch of government is independent of the others

Explanation

Montesquieu was born in 1689 at Chateau de la Bordeaux. He expounded the theory of separation of powers. According to Montesquieu, separation of powers is the best safeguard against the rise of tyrannies. Power needed to be exercised by a separate system or organ to ensure harmony of the state, The three branches of government that are mainly focused in the theory of separation of powers are the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. If executive and legislature were to be united by a single individual, there could rise apprehensions.

 

To be effective an exclusion clause must

Answer

c. be included in the contract when it was entered into

Explanation

Exclusion clause must be reasonable to be effective. For example, a clause that purports to exclude a party's liability for breach of contract will be subjected to reasonability test if the other party is a consumer of business. It must be agreed upon by both parties not only a single party, and must form part of the contractual terms.

Reference

Why use an exclusion clause? Retrieved from: https://rm-legal.co.uk/mark-wright/why-use-an-exclusion-clause/

 

Minors have contractual capacity in regard to

Answer

b. contracts for necessaries and beneficial services

Explanation

Some contracts can be formed and enforced by minors but not against minors. Minors (under the age of 18), lack the capacity to make a contract which means a minor who signs a contract may decide to either honor the deal or void it. Minors can only be bound by contracts involving necessaries and beneficial contracts of service.

Reference

Business Law

By Nickolas James, Timothy Thomas page 250

 

A term can be implied into a contract where

Answer

e. any of the above situations exists

Explanation

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts and are taken to be as effective as if they were included from the beginning of the contract. A court implies terms into a contract when contracts in the same market or trade are presumed to have that term. According to the law of contract by Sullivan & Hilliard (P.162), some terms are implied by courts while others are implied by the statute, some terms are also implied to reflect the trade custom and give effect to parties presumed intentions.

Reference

Australian Commercial Law

By Dilan Thampapillai, Claudio Bozzi, Mark Giancaspro, George Yijun Tian Page 16

 

A voidable transaction includes

Answer

a. an unfair preference

Explanation

According to 'British Virgin Islands Insolvency laws and regulations handbook by IBP (p.114), voidable transaction is used to refer to: an unfair preference, an undervalue transaction, a floating charge that is voidable as described under section 247, and lastly, as an extortionate credit transaction. Unfair preference implies that the liquidator of an insolvent company has the power to recover any unfair debt payments made from unsecured creditors.

 

An ordinary resolution requires the assent of

Answer

c. a simple majority of all shareholders

Explanation

Shareholder resolutions are either passed as ordinary or special resolutions. For ordinary resolutions, these are routine company business which requires a simple majority of shareholders. On the other hand, special resolutions require 75% majority.

 

In the context of alternative dispute resolution

Answer

b. an arbitrator settles the dispute whereas a mediator helps the parties agree on a solution

Explanation

Alternative dispute resolution involves settling disputes using means other than litigation or the use of courts. These includes means such as negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. By using mediation, a third party brings the conflicting parties together to solve the problem for common objective and the mediator does not make any decision on their behalf. On the other hand, arbitrator makes decision on behalf of both parties basing on evidence presented.

 

If C agrees to paint D’s house and D agrees to give C the amount of $ 500

Answer

a. there is a contract because each party would receive consideration.

Explanation

When two parties make an agreement and are expected to perform their obligations, this type of contract is called bilateral contract. For a contract to be considered valid, there must be a consideration which is described as the benefit each party gets from the contractual deal. Party D would gain the service which is having the house painted while party C would gain monetary value for the painting.

 

The three branches of government as provided in the commonwealth constitution are

Answer

b. The executive, the legislature and the judiciary.

Explanation

The three branches of government are the legislature, executive and judiciary. Each of the three branches are independent to prevent any arm or person from becoming too powerful. The legislature has the power to make laws and in Australia, the legislature arm is the parliament. The executive enforce laws and in Australia, it is the executive council. The judiciary interprets and applies laws and in Australia, the judicial arm is the hierarchy of courts headed by the supreme court.

Marked as spam
Answered on June 12, 2020 5:53 pm
0
Private answer

There seem to be several unrelated legal questions in this prompt. Here are some rewritten versions of the questions along with explanations:

  1. If the directors of a small family company exclude one of their members from board meetings, does the excluded director have grounds for legal action?
  • Yes, the excluded director may have grounds for bringing legal action for exclusion from board meetings. This would depend on the specific circumstances and the governing laws and regulations of the company.
  1. What does a participating cumulative share with preference as to dividend give to the holder?
  • A participating cumulative share with preference as to dividend gives the holder the right to receive dividends before holders of common shares. The holder is also entitled to receive any unpaid dividends from previous years before common shareholders.
  1. If a director wishes to take a corporate opportunity, what is required?
  • If a director wishes to take a corporate opportunity, they typically require the consent of the board of directors. This is to ensure that there is no conflict of interest and that the company's best interests are being served.
  1. What happens if a corporation offers securities to the public before a disclosure document is lodged?
  • If a corporation offers securities to the public before lodging a disclosure document, this would likely be a violation of securities laws and regulations. The corporation could face penalties and legal action from regulatory authorities and investors.
  1. If A makes an offer to B and B makes a counter offer which A rejects, what are the legal implications?
  • If A rejects B's counter offer, there is no legally binding agreement between the parties. The original offer made by A has been terminated by the rejection of the counter offer.
  1. What is the doctrine of separation of powers as developed by Montesquieu?
  • The doctrine of separation of powers, as developed by Montesquieu, is the idea that government power should be divided among separate branches - legislative, executive, and judicial - to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and potentially tyrannical.
  1. What is required for an exclusion clause to be effective?
  • For an exclusion clause to be effective, it must be clearly written and brought to the attention of the party being bound by the clause before the contract is signed. The clause must also not be contrary to any laws or public policy.
  1. Do minors have contractual capacity in regard to all types of contracts?
  • No, minors do not have contractual capacity in regard to all types of contracts. In some cases, contracts entered into by minors may be void or voidable, depending on the specific circumstances and governing laws.
  1. Under what circumstances can a term be implied into a contract?
  • A term can be implied into a contract where it is necessary to give business efficacy to the contract, where it is so obvious that it goes without saying, or where it is implied by custom or usage in the relevant trade or industry.
  1. What is a voidable transaction?
  • A voidable transaction is a transaction that is initially valid but can be challenged or avoided by one of the parties due to some defect or irregularity. Examples of voidable transactions include contracts entered into under duress or undue influence, or contracts with minors.
  1. What is required for an ordinary resolution to be passed?
  • For an ordinary resolution to be passed, it requires a simple majority of the votes cast by the shareholders present at the meeting.
  1. What is alternative dispute resolution?
  • Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional court proceedings, such as mediation or arbitration. ADR is often seen as a faster and more cost-effective way of resolving disputes compared to litigation.
  1. What are the legal implications of an agreement between C and D for painting D's house for $500?
  • The legal implications of an agreement between C and D for painting D
Marked as spam
Answered on April 20, 2023 1:16 pm

Professional Essay Helpers Online

Get your papers written by online essay writers available 24/7. Submit your assignments and get a quality plagiarism-free paper via email.

Write My Paper For Me