Which of the following statements are true The more a user has had an opportunity to see and read the terms of service the more likely the court will enforce a terms of service agreement the mere presence of a Terms of Use agreement may not protect the business website If in the Terms of Use agreement are ambiguous may not be enforceable All of the above are true

Which of the following statements are true
The more a user has had an opportunity to see and read the terms of service the more likely the court will enforce a terms of service agreement
the mere presence of a Terms of Use agreement may not protect the business website
If in the Terms of Use agreement are ambiguous may not be enforceable
All of the above are true

Answer

• All of the above are true
  Explanation:
  In Cairo v. Cross Media Services case, it was established that the more a user had access to the terms and conditions agreement on a business website, the more likely the court is to enforce the terms and conditions against that user because the court believes the user had a good chance to make a decision. Mere presence of agreement terms and conditions does not render the agreement valid or enforceable, but the user has to get an opportunity to either accept or reject before proceeding. The key term within the contract should be open to only a single interpretation, otherwise it will be considered ambiguous.